Quote from: TelevisionLover on March 06, 2018, 02:36:21 AM

@nullius, is this it?

The post you quoted referred to others on the previous page. I will here give only brief excerpts from the discussion; as one of the other persons named in that list, you may be interested in reading the whole thing. I think this may (?) have been the first mention of your nym in this thread:

Quote from: nullius on February 28, 2018, 06:57:04 AM

Quote from: alia on February 28, 2018, 06:48:50 AM

Fake investors: nullius is fake? SyGambler is fake? TelevisionLover is gake? I added my brother there to gain credibility, which may have been wrong of me, but to be fair, I do gamble for him a lot, and the amount has been larger than 2 BTC.

The investors in question are not persons who gambled with you while the thread was open, but rather, the investors for whom you shut the thread down. After which you told me that if I wanted back in on the game, minimum investment was 1.2 BTC. Oops, I forgot to mention that before.

Could you have brought a substantial return on 1.2 BTC for me, as you did with my 0.01 BTC? Too bad, Ill never know...

Quote from: nullius on February 28, 2018, 07:11:27 AM

Quote from: Joel_Jantsen on February 28, 2018, 07:04:19 AM

If I understand nullius's point correctly,he wants to know who are the investors you found on the forum who invested 1.2 BTC in that service ? Since you said you have found investors and are not accepting participants anymore,you should have some sort of proof right ?

Actually, no: My point is to inquire as to whether doubling 0.01 BTC for me was an investment on conning a rich mark.

In her very first PM to me, Alia said that I must be rich. I never contradicted this; I let her make her own assumptions. Only after she required 1.2 BTC from me upfront for a deal I had seen to be profitable, I regrettably had to inform her that I do not have that kind of money to invest. I really dont.

My PM inbox got a bit quieter after that...

Quote from: amishmanish on March 06, 2018, 02:50:20 AM

nullius was one of your most well known and well-respected customers. So he gets a 200% return. (Suspicious anyone?).
Its a classic bait before the scam.

I noticed that. This (from another thread) may perhaps be somehow pertinent?

Quote from: nullius on March 04, 2018, 03:12:52 AM

You told me that you initially lost all my money. You said you covered it with your own funds, then recovered, won, and split the profit with me. Beforehand, when you told me that you would not set a stop-loss as I requested, you said (of your own initiative) that you would instead insure my funds; but you did not say that insurance included continued gambling with a split of profits.

FWIW / at face value:

Quote from: Alia

The story is, I lost your initial deposit, so I loaded 0.1 BTC of my own to make it back. Now I'm 0.2 BTC in the green, withdrew a bit of profit, and playing with house money, so thank you xD

Code:

gpg: Signature made Fri Feb 23 06:35:49 2018 UTC
gpg: using RSA key 857D1532A793AAAA0247DE92CED5586964477E72
gpg: Good signature from "Alia <...>"
Primary key fingerprint: 857D 1532 A793 AAAA 0247 DE92 CED5 5869 6447 7E72

Whilst I pick over unaddressed issues, I ought pay more attention to what NLNico gives a whopping +10:

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on February 28, 2018, 11:12:18 AM

Quote from: NLNico on February 28, 2018, 09:10:11 AM

With a bit of searching, it seems like "favours" is actually (serial) scammer "Light" on the site mpgh.net.

[...]

Now back to bitcointalk:

Quote from: favours on May 12, 2017, 11:37:15 AM

As per Lauda's request, I am posting a repayment address here.

1PsfsGbooKzMohG9SshFbNUaHRTZUQeu4S

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1914003.msg18986684#msg18986684

1PsfsGbooKzMohG9SshFbNUaHRTZUQeu4S had 1 TX, sent to Poloniex deposit address "1FtzkMkeggTPq7xVn3vTdbU7cDp9NZJoNc". Other addresses from user "favours" make deposits to the same Poloniex deposit address.

Light's address "15YWc15M7Ht49rMohYrwNh3RggtgAjcMEp" and Alia's address "1Sexyb1p8byGxunfTfHvL9SXsWqHyEPVk" (as seen here), both made payments in to the same cryptopay.me account.

https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/02d8d4de4563bb08?from_address=15YWc15M7Ht49rMohYrwNh3RggtgAjcMEp
https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/b38cffcf6a125c71?from_address=1Sexyb1p8byGxunfTfHvL9SXsWqHyEPVk

So, so, so... Alia shares with her little brother (0) her home network connection (thus IP address, per theymos evidence), (1) her computer, (2) her passwords to various online accounts, and (3) the sacred private keys to her 1Sexy Bitcoin address. Is that right, Alia?

(Any chance you share PGP private keys, too?)

Yet, I still have reasonable doubts! Which is why, Alia, perhaps you should be more accomodating toward anything I might wish to do to investigate those doubts. I am willing to keep an open mind toward the possibility that something highly improbable may have happened here, and give you a chance to explain that to me. Really, I want to know the truth here. But I wont dance to your tune, and I wont expend extraordinary time and effort for you. And I really dont see why you expect me to.