Quote from: btcapparel on March 06, 2018, 10:43:15 AM

Quote from: scambust on March 05, 2018, 07:11:19 AM

Quote from: bulldogtattoo on March 04, 2018, 05:01:05 PM

Quote from: scambust on March 02, 2018, 08:54:37 PM

Quote from: ValeriaMarketSpace on March 01, 2018, 02:20:44 PM

Quote from: scambust on March 01, 2018, 02:12:37 PM

Ok, I'll bite. My first thoughts was "Another file storage system?" There are so many of them with similar use cases and actually none of them has a working model yet. But it seems, this takes storage with a different spin.

Looking forward to learn more.

Thank you for your opinion!
Just to resume, here are the flaws of our competitors that Market.space will bypass:
- Traditional cloud storages (OneDrive, Amazon, Google etc) are not averse to data scanning which means they neglect users privacy. They are also pretty expensive and dont leave much choice imposing fixed packages.
- Decentralized blockchain-based systems are secure compared to cloud storages, but they fail in reliability. Consumer devices cannot be accessible 24/7; they are also susceptible to corruption. This means that no one grants you instant and round-the-clock data access, and your data intactness. Thats why Market.space focuses on professional hosts. The credibility of the hosts and thus responsible storage is guaranteed by the insurance deposits hosts are to make. They are also incentivized by the metrics-based rate system.

So to simplify the explanation. Market.space is a decentralized United Nations of file hosting - where Rapidgator, BlueHost, InMotion Hosting, A Hosting, LiquidWeb, Dropbox, OneDrive, etc all become part of one giant host; where profit is determined by a rate system.

Interesting indeed. I look forward as to how you plan to assemble a minimum threshold of professional hosts that will join.

Do you really think giants like Dropbox and OneDrive will join? They're kind of competitors, right?

It's just an example. The hosting providers that will most likely join are the ones that have a year or two of operations and are willing to try out new markets in order to maximize profit. The big names won't budge because they already have a lead or larger market share.

Hello!
Yes, can't disagree with you

On the other hand, being a market leader, you always have to optimize business processes and save money at different stages.
In this case, using servers of previous generation, for example, look like a good deal
I mean servers with with satisfactory bandwidth capacity