Quote from: s31joemhar on March 07, 2018, 07:17:08 AM

Quote from: cryptoheroin on March 02, 2018, 11:57:42 PM

Im sure this is really going to be a big project, i wonder how the system would be more better than those existing review sites? should there be someone who will accepting helpers?

For a certain induvidual to become part of the lina project review the lina project set an requirements and criterias for you to be officially part of the lina team and the lina project accepts honest reviews and only lina team will hire helpers and moderators.

LiNA is way better than the existing review sites. The technology used was too different from the current review sites. The Helper Board approved the qualified Helper who submitted his/her CV together with proof of domain knowledge, personal value, etc.

Please see below for the strengths of Lina compared to the current system (*based on the LiNA Whitepaper)

Current system

1. The result of the evaluation is not transparent and it is easy to lose trust from users.
2. Easily influenced by outside factors due to centralized review.
3. Users do not have the ability to monetize on the system.
4. No specific review criteria for each subject
5. Often only focus on certain products or services
6. Lack of motivation for reviewers (Common Users and Helpers) to improve their review quality.
7. Revenue is not transparent.

Lina.review

1. The results are completely transparent to the users
2. The assessment is decentralized so it cannot be faked.
3. Users and Helpers can earn Lina token basing on their contribution.
4. Build specific review criteria for each subject with the assistance of available team of Helpers.
5. Unlimited types of products or services.
6. Users can become Helpers if they have many high-quality reviews. Helper may lose their position if there are many poor-quality reviews.
7. Revenue is completely recorded on the blockchain and visible to the public.