Quote from: Quickseller on March 07, 2018, 08:19:44 AM

Quote from: Joel_Jantsen on March 07, 2018, 08:12:17 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on March 07, 2018, 08:04:25 AM

--snip--

If that turns out to be true (assuming one of the parties don't come clean ),they can also be further held responsible for giving merits to alt accounts which is strictly prohibited on the forum.IIRC,Blazed had both of them under his trust list ? As per the given proofs,the addresses used clearly shows the accounts are connected until proven otherwise.

Hhampuz is actually on SaltySpitoon's trust list, and I don't think blazed ever had either on his trust list (he may have had Hhampuz, but I am not sure about this)

In addition to the merit issue, both accounts have vouched for eachother in disputes, such as the above referenced extortion attempt, which IMO is a bigger issue than giving merit to yourself.

I would point out that the addresses were posted around the same time, and TMAN used the address in a signature campaign (and was likely not expected to receive payment for some time) prior to Hhampuz using that address in a raffle.

I think it needs to be pointed out here that you, Quickseller, served as escrow involving trades of your own alt account, Panther52. You charged an escrow fee to vouch for your own alt account as escrow.

On the other hand, hhampuz raffled some collectibles off on behalf of tman so used a tman address as the payment address.

Keep Pounding!