Quote from: atileture on March 07, 2018, 08:23:50 AM

Quote from: nc50lc on March 07, 2018, 03:22:42 AM

Quote from: atileture on March 07, 2018, 03:07:03 AM

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
user : atileture
user ID: 1241330
date : 07.03.2018
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
SdqhuDo5cTHe2ABSbaKinoqZEKRp2zQqrU
H2CK8TwSRBJNpS3tuktlCG1BViW7tN2Ntgz0I7HsfgjYYnq20gaoxuxLK6DRmDtniIK/1OW+YCRvBDwmmXz/LTQ=

Can't verify your signature.
SdqhuDo5cTHe2ABSbaKinoqZEKRp2zQqrU is not a Bitcoin Address,

Quote from: bitmover on March 07, 2018, 01:25:55 AM

I am seeing a lot of people signing messages with Segwit Address (starting with 3 or b).

There is no standard to verify these addresses.

Electrum is somehow verifying them, but only Electrum, and it's nonstandard.

In future there will a standard for those address, to be verified in any wallet, and not necessarily the same Electrum did. In future those signed messages may not be able to be verified. I think it's better to sign with a legacy address for now.

Nope, once other wallets support bc1 addresses, they will eventually be able to verify those addies.

I use Bitcoin Address, quote and verify please.

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is atileture ( u=1241330 ) from bitcointalk, creating this message at 7 March 2018.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
16VNapxxWZjwmwRgKze9RVQ3KP828NUZVR
IBR//BO2CjNOMYJU/7/OdoVKUc1Wsk/C71tryuQaiDJ5Ch40GBapQyAhEuN8URdh8sgYykUO8QnFtS25WKrvxls=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Quoted and verified using Electrum.