Quote from: mootinator on September 17, 2013, 10:58:06 PM

Quote from: alp on September 15, 2013, 06:35:17 PM

Quote from: r.schulz on August 28, 2013, 03:51:36 AM

Quote from: alp on August 21, 2013, 08:59:04 PM

The idea is no one really knows what the difficulty will be in December.

So you have various levels of X, and they require different contribution shares from each party.

To define those levels you gave in the example you would need to know the probabilities to start out with. But as you say no one knows those probabilities. And the different contracts would become (un)interesting as new information becomes available and so the community estimate goes up or down. The icbit Dec contract started out at 300M and it last trade was at 484M. This free trading of these future contracts allows the community to bet on the future difficulty without anyone having to guess the probability upfront. It allows the price to reflect news as they become available from the ASIC vendors. And if enough people participate, the efficient market hypothesis predicts that the market value should be a good estimate for the December price. In that case it would not only help miners to hedge but also give them this good estimate as free information. Right now the estimate is probably not very accurate because the volume is low. On the upside, this gives a good opportunity to anyone interested to bet on the difficulty and who think the difficulty will be lower or higher than currently traded.

The market can define those probabilities just like the icbit contract. . . etc.

Intrade anyone?

Intrade is long gone, and would be something Bitcoin could easily be used to replace it. RIP Intrade.