Quote from: Fermin AK on March 07, 2018, 08:42:32 PM

Quote from: areschen on March 07, 2018, 04:44:53 PM

Quote from: huutertools on March 07, 2018, 10:32:25 AM

Quote from: Makkara on March 07, 2018, 10:03:14 AM

Quote from: imtiazmahmood on March 07, 2018, 09:30:03 AM

Quote from: omwibya on March 07, 2018, 09:13:03 AM

Quote from: Jepli on March 05, 2018, 07:16:45 PM

Quote from: Axcel-m on March 05, 2018, 03:11:57 PM

Quote from: mig6r on March 05, 2018, 12:40:33 PM

Quote from: sambuki on March 03, 2018, 03:35:24 PM

Quote from: the_donald on March 03, 2018, 03:29:49 PM

Quote from: belechau on March 03, 2018, 03:24:19 PM

Quote from: Makkara on March 03, 2018, 11:37:52 AM

Quote from: CryptoCutie on March 03, 2018, 10:39:58 AM

The Demo, the beta demo will starts after ICO and investors can participate in the beta testing.

that is going to be available at some point after March, it said Q2

Very good that Repu already has something to present in Q2, is the most requested so far, will be a differential and so much for the project, and certainly something that will help eliminate many doubts about the functionality of the Platform and its possibilities of application

I would've hoped that they have a beta before the ICO to advertise better, but I'll take what I can get.

Agreed, beta before ICO will be better and not after it. Imo, when investors able to see something before investing their money is the most affordable thing in ICO's projects.

I always have a hard time to understand why teams would decide to not first build the beta and then go for the ICO, unless funds from the ICO might be critical to the development of the beta. Usually if you have a great product you should be better off having the beta ready during the ICO.

Sometimes there are more disadvantages to publish a beta or a klick dummy. If it is a realy complex product and a development with low effort is not possible it does not makes sense. The investors wont be happy about the result.

I think you a have a point. There are so many factors that might affect platform development, but the most important thing is we should have assurance of the DEVs commitment and enthusiasm to the project

I agree, if the platform is complex then it may not be practical to have a demo beforehand. it is however necessary to give something to investors.

i think Repu project release DEMO announcement for users or investors, that will be plus point for this REPU project. but i am not demanding to increase, they just make a demo video for investors. that will be good or easy.

i reckon this would be the right way to go, also because the ico and mvp date are soon going to overlap

Maybe a demo video would be enough to image the approach of the solution. A running beta is much more work.
I think there are people need to spent a lot of tome to understand repu and this would be easier with a video.

Personally, I hope I can see how demo products work before the ICO, It can gives me more confidence

I think that the more information investors have, the more security they will have. What will encourage them to invest and a demo is the most reliable source of information as it serves to test the product.

I agree that demo could convince many people but don't forget how crucial can good partnership be