Re: Joe's Signatureless Challenge: Win $25 ($10 for 2nd) + 8 Merits every week!
BitcoinTalk Username: purple.thoughts
Starting Post Count (including this one): 67
Current Rank: jr. member
BTC Address: 38mQRiQkzbvYwVet6cdn1DUbHjc1zeZxZS
This is a good thing because it encourages not only spammers but all those who really want to post quality posts.
Starting Post Count (including this one): 67
Current Rank: jr. member
BTC Address: 38mQRiQkzbvYwVet6cdn1DUbHjc1zeZxZS
This is a good thing because it encourages not only spammers but all those who really want to post quality posts.
One, you're wearing a signature so you're disqualified
Two, the campaign is currently closed for this week
@BTCforJoe, I suggest adding an explicit written rule disqualifying people who make a patent demonstration of having failed to read the rules. The length of disqualification should be proportional to how outrageously the rules were ignored. In any case where its obvious that a bounty-grubber is blindly groping for a place to drop a username and Bitcoin address, disqualification may as well be permanent.
That gets from me a rare emoticon: :-(
A Wild Gleb Gamow Appears
;-)
The entire point of the campaign is to promote quality posting, not providing spammers with additional funds (and merits) for low quality posts and the ability to read is pretty much a necessity. I second the idea for a disqualification for the future.
I agree with you two. That will make merits and funds to be given only to people wanting to improve. I consider myself one of those, since i'm still new and i want to constantly learn more about Bitcoin and at the same time improve my writing and creativity, vital skills to do what i want in the future.
I really like this forum and i want to be reach the level of a respectable member one day. I will work hard for it
