Quote from: skorupi17 on March 10, 2018, 12:14:47 PM

Quote from: Vod on March 10, 2018, 04:58:58 AM

Ideally, managers that accept negative trust members should receive negative trust themselves. :/

And for what charges? Trusting the not trusted? Trust is too vague for that.

For these charges - Giving potential scammers/account traders/alt account ring enjoy the privilages of being in this forum (which includes campaigns)

Quote from: skorupi17 on March 10, 2018, 12:14:47 PM

Quote from: BitNaija on March 10, 2018, 05:31:01 AM

And how about managers with negative trust managing bounty?

What about them?

If some company hires such a manager then its a red mark for that company. Not that they would care much if they are not interested in the affairs of this forum.

Quote from: skorupi17 on March 10, 2018, 12:14:47 PM

Quote from: Xiaolongnu on March 10, 2018, 08:49:17 AM

I think that no manager want to accept participants with negative trust. Maybe that they forgot to include it in their bounty rule.

I assume that they are just not bothered about trust ratings. Most campaigns are up to advertising only. They want more people to know about their product/service/project so they don't pay much attention to an account's reputation.

Like I said above the company might not be interested in the forum affairs and how trust works. They would be interested in promoting their project. However a DT-red trusted member is likely an alt account/sold account/loan defaulter or simply a scammer. If they promote a project then its going to get raised eyebrows from the public who view their posts.

Ideally DT-marked red trust members should not be allowed to participate. However managers should work on understanding which rating is BS and which one is valid.