Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: [List] Suspected users that are abusing merit 3.0
by
tricker01
on 10/03/2018, 08:47:21 UTC
Intentionally giving merit to their alternative account to gain the bonus given in signature campaign. As proof please refer the images together with the link below:

kpcian given smerit their alternative account Bdstar
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=879468



Additional proof that accounts are owning by one user's, Kindly checked the wallet they were used it was the same.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=879468



https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=911296




Found someone abusing the system

USER PROFILE :
vetrovppp
platinov_and
MERIT SUMMARY :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1117777
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1117752

PROOF:
The posts that were merited are not helpful/constructive at all one is a report from a bounty thread and the other post is about games they play anyone can easily reply from the thread.

MISCELLANEOUS:
One thing to notice is that the merits given out by these users are only two minutes apart.




USER PROFILE : f1rstalex
MERIT SUMMARY : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1087102
PROOF:
January 27, 2018, 12:32:10 PM: 2 to AgataFox for Re: Merit - чтo этo и кaк этим пoльзoвaтьcя
January 27, 2018, 12:30:34 PM: 1 to AgataFox for Re: Merit - чтo этo и кaк этим пoльзoвaтьcя
January 27, 2018, 12:29:05 PM: 2 to AgataFox for Re: Merit - чтo этo и кaк этим пoльзoвaтьcя

January 27, 2018, 12:37:28 PM: 2 from AgataFox for Re: [BOUNTY]🔶Crowd Genie🔶:First Asia-wide Asset Exchange🔶High Payout💰💰
January 27, 2018, 12:31:00 PM: 1 from AgataFox for Re: [BOUNTY]🔶Crowd Genie🔶:First Asia-wide Asset Exchange🔶High Payout💰💰
January 27, 2018, 12:29:23 PM: 2 from AgataFox for Re: [BOUNTY]🔶Crowd Genie🔶:First Asia-wide Asset Exchange🔶High Payout💰💰

MISCELLANEOUS:User received 5 merit from    AgataFox  and gave them  5 back. This merit was sent with an interval < 5minutes


USER PROFILE : Chachacoin17
MERIT SUMMARY : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1002351
PROOF:
MISCELLANEOUS: alts, very long deep accusation here-> marcuslong can be not an alt, no proof found, other users are linked with eth address-> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3018656.msg31225355#msg31225355

Was about to post the exact same thing, but looks like you have already picked up this obvious merit buying or multi-account merit sharing! It could be multi-accounts, as the poor grammar in the posts from the merit sender and receiver is very similar.

I think you'd have more people contributing to sharing merit problems if there was an incentive, like receiving merit for being the first person to point out an issue.

USER PROFILE :
ZenFr <- not sure, but how much are the odds? 50x2 merit in 5 minutes on those 2 guys
CarlOrff
Coin++
MERIT SUMMARY :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=511933
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=822485
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=990983
PROOF:
<- not sure, but how much are the odds? 50x2 merit in 5 minutes on those 2 guys



MISCELLANEOUS: the chances accounts are not linked seems very low to me,
Name:    CarlOrff
Posts:    761
Activity:    504
Merit:    357 <- need to increase to rank up

There's a lot of suspected cheaters in this thread are those people get any sanctions??? Or still nothing because they can't review those accounts??? If the DT's or some famous person of bitcointalk are saw any findings more people are gives merit but if the people are not famous they can't give merit instead red trust. That's how merit systems unfair