Quote from: rajatjain on March 10, 2018, 04:49:36 AM

I see so many of the users of the forum who are having negative trusts getting accepted into bounty campaigns! Most of the campaigns do not allow users with negative trust to enroll in their campaign but there are some which do not follow this rule. Shouldn't the users with negative trusts be not allowed to set up signatures of any kind from the forum's end itself ?

With random jerks added to the DT system,no one really takes those negative ratings seriously.You could see how people suck upto each other just to be there,usually,only handful of members on the DT are rational with their ratings,everybody else is just taking advantage of the power.It's totally fine for the managers to accept members in the campaign if their ratings are not justified and they have high posting quality.

Quote from: rajatjain on March 10, 2018, 04:49:36 AM

To ensure that trust actually works and means something, shouldn't the campaigns which accept participants of negative trust be not allowed on this forum?

Why ? If DT members leave someone a feedback such as "Don't trust him he is an idiot" why would any campaign manager should take that feedback seriously unless he is paying upfront ?

Quote from: hilariousetc on March 10, 2018, 11:18:34 AM

Which campaigns exactly? This isn't really a forum issue either as there's no rules on what users campaigns can or cannot accept, but if they're a campaign that are just accepting anyone and an unlimited amount of users without checking the quality of their content they should face repercussions.

Correct.