Quote from: Daggett993 on September 21, 2013, 08:09:01 AM

As an investor of Just-Dice who is now down a very considerable amount of coins (Now fully divested however), I'd like to open up this thread in dedication to bringing Doog, Just-Dice, and Letsdice to justice.

Dooglus has access to the non hashed server seeds, meaning he knows what the rolls are going to be ahead of time. Due to this he is able to bet on his alias Celeste/nakowa/allover & win excessive amounts of Bitcoin. With the name AllOver I almost feel like I'm being mocked at this point.

This EXTREMELY ODD evidence is what triggered this investigation and my realization that I was scammed for well over 50 BTC on my investment.

Just-Dice & Towtoad were registered a week between each other. Meaning Celeste/Nakowa had already planned on releasing a dice site BEFORE he won the excessive money from JD? It sounds like planning ahead to me... planning ahead a ponzi

- But why would Doog make towtoad.com?
It's fairly obvious that Doog is a smart person. In order to cover his tracks and make his scheme look more legitimate, he opened a competitor site to give the illusion it isn't him. When first confronting Doog, his reply was "But didn't Celeste go make a rival site" (Or something along those lines). It's obvious this is his 'fall back' excuse which he's hoping will consolidate his ponzi. Shame he forgot to differentiate the domains...

- But wouldn't coding a new dice site outweigh that small illusion he'd be presenting?
Towtoad was a complete copy of Just-Dice, there were slight design changes & a few extra features which Doog was probably planning on implementing on Just-Dice but decided against it for whatever reason. It wouldn't have taken more than a few hours to have it up & running.

Please post in this thread any other evidence, explanations or suspicions that you fall upon! Lets bring this disgusting piece of work DOWN!

Your reasoning suffers from a lot of quite visible bias (easily explainable, you lost BTC). While that doesn't make it wrong, it does make it unworthy of consideration (and if you're wondering, this is why conspiracy theorists are universally derided: not because they're right or wrong, but because pretty much nobody cares to cut through the bias cream to get to a factual determination of right or wrong).

It is in general a great idea to look for holes, flaws, and problems in any business scheme proposed in BTC. We've always encouraged it, people have always been doing it. In order for it to be useful it has to be done better than a mess of post hoc ergo propter hoc and assorted augural practices.

More practically, you are never ever under any circumstances to invest ANY sum of BTC, even if you don't consider it "significant", and even if it is in point of fact not significant, until you've spent at the very least six months reading the wisdom of #bitcoin-assets, or being told there that you'll probably be okay, whichever comes later. This last point is very important, as it sounds for all of you noobs: stop acting like you're alone on an island and just invented Bitcoin. People much smarter than you have been involved for years by now, and going forth on delusions of grandeur will just get you burned.