Quote from: jkminkov on September 21, 2013, 10:39:14 AM

Quote from: marto74 on September 21, 2013, 10:17:04 AM

Quote from: jkminkov on September 21, 2013, 09:16:40 AM

there's no need for a vote, design fees should be included in PCB cost, not on chips which we never received, at last we saw why your board price is cheaper than another - cause your calculations are all wrong!

You do not need to offend me.

Just say that you think I do not deserve payment for organizing this group. THAT IS ENOUGH

I have lost two months worth of wages here, and I have every right to offend every female collateral relative of yours.

Could you all please calm down ? We're all sitting in the same boat and it does not get better if we start to throw stones at our heads, because the harbour closed their doors(i.e avalon).
@racquemis: What you say isnt true ? How do you get to those 18,3% ?
He takes 9%(8.68% to be exact.) what it exactly what was stated on the first page. It's 0.9% less than SebastianJu and Zefir wanted to take.

782.1BTC * 1,09 = 852,489 pet batch.
Makes 0.0852489 BTC/Chip
In my example 32 Chips at 0.0852489 BTC/Chip that makes 2.7279648 BTC
I only payed 2.72BTC because the rest was ceiled down.(We all did, just an example on my own investement)
(2.72 /32) = 0.085 BTC/Chip * 10000 = 850 BTC/Batch

Compared to its original price: 782.1/850 = 0.9201176
Now lets build the inverse of this 1/0.9201176 = 1,0868175
Which results in a margin taken by marto of 8,68% instead of 9%.
Which now builds the discrepancy on that what you paid and the deducted fee from marto. In other words deduct 8.68% from the original price of 0.0085 btc and you got the right solution.