Quote from: DPoS on September 21, 2013, 11:01:09 PM

Quote from: Meizirkki on September 21, 2013, 09:47:46 PM

Quote from: titomane on September 21, 2013, 09:42:21 PM

Quote from: Meizirkki on September 21, 2013, 09:04:57 PM

Quote from: titomane on September 21, 2013, 08:50:11 PM

In this auction you can see that consumption is not 0.7w/Ghs wall is 1.56w/Ghs

http://www.ebay.com/itm/BITFURY-55nm-ASIC-Bitcoin-Miner-In-Hand-115-GHashes-180W-not-Avalon-BFL-/111172547420?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item19e266735c

bitfury chip can do 0.3W/Gh
Complete devices delivered by Bitfurystrikesback did 0.8W/Gh, measured at wall.

Just fixing your facts

With 400Gh/s & 400w win 7340$ first month
http://mining.thegenesisblock.com/a/e01d0bc449
With 734Gh/s & 1150w win 13400$ first month
http://mining.thegenesisblock.com/a/acc6a91153

Which do you prefer? BTC or watts. Because I'm not greenpeace mining.

So you did care enough to do some research of your own. Nice.

you didn't respond to the part where he clowned you for caring about wattage

are you going to make some graph that shows how long term power savings means a shit compared to short term Gh increase?

tl:dr,
> titomane opens up a discussion about bitfury's power consumption in the KnC thread.
> I politely correct his misinformation
> titomane comes up with an imaginary scenario about bitfury hardware.
> DPoS wants me to make a graph based on titomane's imaginary scenario.

nope, I'm not doing it.