Quote from: Legion13 on March 11, 2018, 03:37:43 PM

Quote from: rajatjain on March 10, 2018, 04:49:36 AM

To ensure that trust actually works and means something, shouldn't the campaigns which accept participants of negative trust be not allowed on this forum?

Why shouldn't they be allowed? Just because a person has a negative trust it doesn't mean he is a scammer or a shit poster. They might be tagged for various other reasons or maybe due to butt hurting a DT member. Seeing the current state of the DT and the members raising accusations to remove some other member I don't see any point in trusting the system.

LOL the number of idiots in this forum who dont know a thing about how the forum works always keeps increasing. Negative trust from DT is given when they fell that person may be associated with attempting a scam or potential scammer. Again those who abuse campaigns and giveaways using alt accounts will receive negative trust.

Managers often maintain own trust list which maybe modified according to their need. I am sure more "sane" managers would like to look into the trust ratings and clarify if that rating is due to a personal dispute/butthurt feedback or not.

Also "Shitposter" is not a warrant for negative trust anymore - it was transient for sometime in the past few months. (Lets not talk about that incident)