Quote from: imanubernoob on March 11, 2018, 05:21:15 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on March 11, 2018, 04:37:52 PM

Quote from: imanubernoob on March 11, 2018, 03:46:44 PM

You are the shill for someone apparently I wonder who?

let me spell it out for you.

BTCjam was a peer-to-peer lending service where people from around the world connect to borrow and lend using bitcoin.
Bitconnect was a peer-to-peer lending service where people from around the world connect to borrow and lend using bitcoin.

What part of the analogy did you fail to comprehend?

Bitconnect was not peer-to-peer. Bitconnect did not lend to anyone. Bitconnect did not borrow bitcoin, which would mean they would repay in Bitcoin - no, they sold their wortless shitcoin for bitcoin and borrowed said shitcoin and repaid when it dropped 90%.

Three lies in one sentence. Try again.

Never wrote any of that.

the words written above are pretty straightforward:

"Bitconnect was a peer-to-peer lending service."

Never claimed Bitconnect lent to anyone. Never claimed they borrowed BTC. Never wrote any of the above so how can you claim it is a lie? Simple you are a paid shill for the banks. Try again shill.

Hmmm... you did actually:

Quote

Bitconnect was a peer-to-peer lending service where people from around the world connect to borrow and lend using bitcoin.

"Bitconnect was a peer-to-peer lending service" - a lie, it was a centralized entity, not peer-to-peer.
"where people from around the world connect to borrow" - a lie, people could not borrow from Bitconnect or from each other via Bitconnect.
"lend using bitcoin" - a lie, people could "lend" only BCC, not Bitcoin, although you could probably weasel out of this by claiming that you meant using Bitcoin to buy BCC.