Quote

I already have checked the feedback regarding a blog being bought from pinkman12345 by rakeshdobar1

Avirunes correct me if I am wrong:

Raw WHOIS Record

Domain Name: btc-review.news
Registry Domain ID: dede8d950ea949f79de3d6344f0087db-RSIDE
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.namecheap.com
Registrar URL: https://www.namecheap.com/
Updated Date: 2017-10-09T18:05:04Z
Creation Date: 2017-03-21T13:50:22Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2018-03-21T13:50:22Z

As you posted, Chevas Regal said that he is looking for logo for his site on March 21., while domain was created the same day.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1836416.msg18277939#msg18277939

This conversation would imply...

Quote from: pinkman12345 on March 12, 2018, 08:55:43 AM

...that conversation happened on February 2. 2018. Correct? ~~Hm, strange, because:~~

This is transaction ID https://etherscan.io/tx/0x6e5f5a51458ac2af6f8e8f04ec2d03290c04a7981dc4fe2f451067032d690d61 from that screenshot, ~~dated Feb-07-2018 03:26:19 AM +UTC~~

Eth was sent from this address 0x6a2ffb67be461326116dcedb6793544ddafe32df to this address 0xc1cffd5deec9f323e4144f617d9a4fd139abf8da

Only 1 hour after that transaction, eth was sent back to this address 0x6a2ffb67be461326116dcedb6793544ddafe32df from 0xc1cffd5deec9f323e4144f617d9a4fd139abf8da :

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x03b06df22852ebf902791ae1bfff19679456025841fdda5747285df258695b16

~~also, old registrant first name: chevas, second name: regal and chevas bitcointalk in search field, "to me"...~~

Quote from: pinkman12345 on March 12, 2018, 08:55:43 AM

would imply...what?

There are 2 possibilities:
1) Old registrant received this email, which would imply that old registrant is chevas regal( 0/+2)(haven't repay 0.115btc loan to conduras but somehow he still has positive trust)
2) New registrant received this email, which would imply that screenshot was posted by buyer, rakeshdobar1

Correct me if I am wrong. [/s]