Quote from: Monkey1 on March 12, 2018, 11:53:39 AM

Quote from: traveler007 on March 12, 2018, 08:49:25 AM

Quote from: Nold on March 12, 2018, 08:45:35 AM

Quote from: Krezz2017 on March 04, 2018, 09:50:31 PM

He looked at the white paper. Much has learned about the principles of the chain of blocks. But, the eye was soapy because of a lot of unnecessary information and until I saw for myself what the innovation is in this particular coin.

Yes. This project seems to me incomplete. The team hurried with ICO. For the long term - neutral forecast. But in the short term - negative (bear market Sad

).

Another one "ICON"? Why we (Korea) need this, if ICON already have existing product in Korea? What advantages here before ICON?

ICON is a much better project, but competition is always good. Competition increases quality.

The purpose of Yggdrash and ICON is different.
Yggdrash aims not only to connect some blockchains but to solve existing mining competition systems.
The concept of Yggdrash seems to be expected, but it's difficult to realize systems the project aims for.