Quote from: Legion13 on March 12, 2018, 05:33:41 PM

Quote from: TheUltraElite on March 12, 2018, 02:14:10 PM

Also "Shitposter" is not a warrant for negative trust anymore - it was transient for sometime in the past few months. (Lets not talk about that incident)

I was talking about this exact situation and why people need to given a chance. If that is changed as you are stating then there is no more validation required here.

And why is a scammer even allowed to a part of the forum even after getting a negative rating. Its the same as allowing a murderer to roam around the streets even after he is found guilty by law. I don't promote scamming but a scammer doesn't even deserve a negative rating and should be banned at once for his actions. This is followed a lot in other forums (Not naming any).

People dont need to be given any chance. Being liberal is accepting a scammer for future as "not a scammer". The forum policies are very clear, make some attempt to cheat some campaigns and you will be marked with a red tag.

Also being a scammer to someone is relative, even if the DT rating are based on some legitimacy that the DT is trustworthy - but many have gone rogue in the past years and thus changes are needed. Again moderators/admins dont ban scammers, you have to be careful of them or in this case managers need to scrutinize those whom they recruit as campaigners.