Quote from: tucenaber on September 23, 2013, 10:39:20 PM

Quote from: Bitcycle on September 23, 2013, 10:18:30 PM

Quote from: velacreations on September 23, 2013, 10:13:40 PM

Quote from: Bitcycle on September 23, 2013, 10:10:48 PM

Seriously, dude.

still not able to dispute the math, huh?

You've been trounced math-wise. If you haven't seen that, it doesn't speak well of your analytical skills.

Sigh. You know math isn't a spectator sport Wink

Either you verify it yourself or it doesn't count.

If you download the figures from blockchain.info you get the last 50 transactions. Excluding the tiny ones gives 44. There are two bumps with a low period in between. The low period has an implied hashrate of 538 GH/s. The average over the last 44 transactions gives you an implied hashrate of about 716 GH/s.

Note that both of these numbers are below the team number. Please explain.

You're right regarding the average over the last 44 transactions, but you have to agree that the last 10 transactions are consistently higher than the previous transactions by about 50%.

Their previous payments were consistent at 0.1 every hour, and the payments in the last 8 hours are consistent at 0.15 every hour.

When I put that together with their last statement, I get an impression that they already have around 50% more hashing power not yet merged with the Labcoin team, due to the known stability issues, and we all know how people here react to the unstable hashrate figures!

Time will tell.

Quote from: labcoin on September 23, 2013, 12:17:18 PM

For what concerns the hashrate, as soon as we reach stability with another batch, we will merge it on btcguild, be patient.