Quote from: Jet Cash on March 14, 2018, 10:53:42 AM

It sounds like a good idea on the face of it, but I suspect that the bad managers will arrange for their posters to receive merit to bypass the restriction.

Ouch! This is a heavy allegation. You make it sound like the campaign managers are accomplices in this spamming the forum struggles to eradicate.

Quote from: TheQuin on March 14, 2018, 02:29:56 PM

The problem is that in a lot of the altcoin/ico bounties the managers don't give a shit and just want to get as many page impressions as possible regardless.

Managers here express more laxity than their colleagues at the btc paying campaigns. I don't think they deliberately want to not be thorough but maybe the crave to keep the scarcely got jobs make them a bit relaxed with strictness to adherence to posting rules.

Quote from: Vod on March 14, 2018, 04:06:48 PM

If Theymos implements rules, he then needs to enforce them. :/

We need more moderators!

Quote from: Cobalt9317 on March 14, 2018, 04:20:01 PM

Then hire more eligible moderators.
If it would help the forum certain laws/rules need to be brought in stage.

I think the forums have enough moderators. They only need to step up their game and be top notch getting defaulters to face the wrath of the forum. The existing laws need to start getting enforced.

Quote from: Joel_Jantsen on March 14, 2018, 11:14:03 AM

Quote from: yahoo62278 on March 14, 2018, 11:07:01 AM

Something like users must earn 5 merits a months for their account to display a signature if being done by theymos or managers can make a user earn 1 merit per week to stay in a campaign.

I strongly disagree with this.Even though the merit system is doing well,I don't think every quality poster is awarded merits.My point being,a participant could be a great quality poster but due to whatever reasons his unmerited posts shouldn't stop him from participating in campaigns.

Well done Joel. Your position can not be faulted.