Quote from: Digital Drug Lord on March 17, 2018, 01:45:21 PM

Quote from: classicsucks on March 15, 2018, 07:37:25 AM

Quote from: Digital Drug Lord on March 14, 2018, 10:48:03 PM

Quote from: Bitbobb on March 14, 2018, 10:00:18 PM

Dear Digital drug whisperer, can you please provide some evidence for your bold grandiose statements? I notice you typed many words with no links. I guess you would have included evidence if you had ANY to support your claims. Silly me for asking right?

Explain how it got on coinbase, the one exchange most people are only legally allowed to buy from so fast?

Explain Why this fork? Out of all the others forks of Bitcoin this on lands on coinbase?

I think some bankers made it and with their connections put it on coinbase. You can say that Bitcoin cash was just put in the wild and it grew to it's price today naturally but me and you know that's just a lie right?

So how is bitcoin cash NOT a bankers coin is the real question, because everything points to it being a bankers coin, or some corporation or shadow owners

Yeah I think you lost the plot, must be those digital drugs...

Coinbase was the LAST major exchange to support BCH. They only added support kicking and screaming 3 months after the fork, and that happened only because there was a lawsuit pending from people who had BTC balances in Coinbase accounts at the time of the fork. If you know your shit, you'd know that the exchange was essentially STEALING their customers' BCH coins. The customers were extra pissed because BCH price pumped to $3000 during the time Coinbase had everything frozen, then dropped below $1000. By the time Coinbase added BCH support and let finally people withdraw or sell their BCH, the markets went crazy for a day. Now Coinbase to deal with has another lawsuit alleging that employees profited trading BCH on inside information (although that's not technically illegal at this time).

We all know Coinbase is a dodgy exchange - it's only for dummies who don't know where else to shop. They've been hacked several times, they bend over and spread their cheeks for the IRS and the Feds daily, and they're pretty much always behind in terms of innovation.

Back to your point. Bitcoin BTC is compromised by bankers, not BCH! Blockstream deliberately limited the blocksize and tried to break Bitcoin. When that didn't work well enough, they added Segwit, which broke BTC more. Now they built Lightning on top of broken BTC, and that doesn't work either. You starting to see a pattern?

BCH saved the original Bitcoin vision as outlined in the whitepaper. If you don't believe me, there are 10 or so computer scientists who can explain this to you. But you're going to have to do some reading and think independently. Probably better to stay off the /r/Bitcoin poison.

So coinbase has to support Bitcoin private the same way it supported bit coin cash then. It's a fork. It should support every fork not just one.

Where are all the lawsuits from the Bitcoin private crowd demanding their bit coin privates from coinbase?

Can anyone make a bit coin fork now and then complain kicking and screaming about lawsuits to get their coin listed on coinbase? Because the point you proved is someone made a fork and then "complained" and then it magically appeared on coinbase. And even after it magically appeared after all the kicking and screaming coinbase still was hit with an insider trading lawsuit

If coinbase only added Bitcoin cash after all this "kicking and screaming"

it is because people knew that bitcoin cash is the real bitcoin and coinbase is subject to the same market forces as us all. Hope that clears everything up for you. regards