Quote from: SteveSokolowski on March 15, 2018, 02:44:37 PM

Quote from: N-rG on March 15, 2018, 11:54:57 AM

Mhm if I read the details I like the ideas and concepts of GC. I think GC is just behind in marketing compared to others cryptos. But it's not bad. Since some problems with the blockchain were not solved and it looks like there are still some issues (I am not up to date here) I prefer less marketing to that point everything works smooth and then the coins skyrockets.

So we are already at kinda an ATL. No impulses from the market so far. So we cannot do much wrong with grapping some more coins.

On the other hand Poloniex were bought by circle. I am a bit afraid that due to the wallet issues GC will be no longer supported by circle then. Moreover I am not sure if sponsoring clans is the right way because I have no idea if casual gamers are interested in that. And casual gamers are the cash cows. But last is something I just think about, I have no qualifications in that matter.

The low is not caused by marketing; it's caused by the current fork. The developers have not been active in ensuring that all wallets and exchanges upgrade to it. I'm shocked that Gamecredits is only down 9% given that it hasn't had any blocks since 1:40am.

I urge everyone here to review the call to action on Gamecredits at https://forums.prohashing.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&p=17089#p17089 and do something to ensure that the coin does not die.

We've reached out to all major exchanges and wallets to upgrade. Bittrex, BitBay, Cryptopia, HitBTC, Livecoin, and Poloniex all gave confirmation of making the upgrades (or have finished making upgrades and will activate wallets soon). We released wallet builds to our community, released our updated blockexplorer, updated our web wallet (with tens of thousands of users), and are waiting on confirmation from wallet providers (like coinomi) to confirm an upgrade. Mining pools of a similar hashpower that we've been in direct contact with have not reported the same sort of issues.