Doog could show my chart, it has a nice graph to it until I busted.
Same for everyone else with a system - their graphs look good until they bust. There's a reason for that.
Just the rest of them don't then try to beg other people to fund the next bet in return for SOME of the profit (when of course any investor could make the bet themself and get ALL the profit and none of the CP risk).
But ... any other player or investor playing the game would be at a different point in the sequence than I would. I'm essentially selling my seeds: the combination of the current server seed, the client seed, and the next nonce is going to win.
I just lost 6 times in a row, and statistically, and probably, the next roll will not be a loss but a win.
The sha256 hash of the server seed you are currently using is:
efea6ea47385d8c410cbc5368256a44e90867f0ef1d700ac24267a0a21f23bf0
The client seed currently in use:
407256479211242005237104
and the number of bets you have made using it:
1334413
What I'm saying about my own account is roll number 1334414 is going to win.
Anyways, I've stopped begging a long time ago. The ones who "invested" in my "gambling security" did it willingly and contacted me directly. No one ever contributed to the "Group Bet" I started even earlier.
As for the security of SHA2 (SHA256 to SHA512) and HMAC. They are useful for the purpose they were created and designed for. As a message digest that can reliably be used to confirm that the original input is exactly the same.
I have a slight suggestion for dooglus in the way he implements the lucky number generation. Use the nonce twice. Once as concatenated input to the "secret", and second as concatenated input to the "message".
If he does this, I've also lost my winning roll #1334414, which previously had a max bet of 3,910.93 at the chance I play (87.7779%). Now I'm limited to a max bet of 642.33.
This can be proven, if indeed dooglus changes the implementation of lucky.txt, by getting my prior server seed, the client seed, and the specific nonce 1334414, and if I would have won that roll or not using the original implementation. However, I'll not get to claim the win cuz it won't happen. (oh sure, I can restart my run for another 1.3 million rolls, maybe ...)