Quote from: suchmoon on March 21, 2018, 03:33:04 PM

Quote from: korvas128 on March 21, 2018, 11:02:15 AM

Suchmoons comment is rubbish so feel free to pull out your charts and prove me wrong Grin

You were the one claiming I would have been a lot richer... and failed to show that even assuming an ideal scenario, i.e. one full masternode, always online. How about 19k coins? Or 35k? Or cold wallets?

Here is the thing with mining that you have no clue about: at any given time I don't risk more than 1% of my investment (closer to 0.5% these days) to any third party (e.g. exchange or pool), I don't need to keep any coins other than the 0.5-1% online, I have good liquidity, and I don't depend on someone else making money for me.

You may not like it because Garza told you that POS is superior and that's fine. But lying to ME about ME hasn't worked before and it won't work now... you need to rethink you shilling strategy. How about you tell us how the wallet fix is going, or how great the games are (if there are any). I need a laugh, please.

Lets not get side tracked.....

Quote from: suchmoon on March 19, 2018, 05:05:38 PM

45-55k sat at ICO time, barely 30k now and the wallet is borked... no, I would have been poorer.

What you posted is rubbish, I challenge it and your response is an attempt to move the discussion off topic to your carbon friendly mining operation.

I have no clue why you mention Garza but I guess when you have a massive chip on your shoulder it makes perfect sense.

Let people read your rubbish and decide for themselves