Quote from: SFR10 on March 20, 2018, 01:32:20 PM

- For verification, a simple screenshot of the changes to CPU usage, can be good enough (while monitoring it using the "Resource Monitor" or other similar programs).

- In regards to formatting, perhaps we should remove websites that no longer use it and instead, have them in a separate section/list (this way we could easily scroll the list and also save some spaces).

Found a website that has compiled a lot of these websites (tested and some of them, no longer use it):

Should we only list crypto related websites or others too?

Do you think that looking at CPU usage would be sufficient for this kind of thing? I'm thinking a lot of poorly programmed sites, that simply use more resources than they should might get accused with that criteria. It might be a good place to start though.

I agree to the formatting suggestion, and I will change OP accordingly once I get a minute. I'm also going to go through that list that you linked and see if it is reasonable to incorporate that into my OP or simply link to it and create this list in addition to that. I think we should add all websites, because TPB isn't particularly related to crypto currency; it still has a significant impact in and on the cryptocurrency community.

Quote from: slaman29 on March 19, 2018, 04:48:31 PM

I'd like to mention a site, playforcrypto.com

Thank you for your suggestion, added to OP, with your comments taken into consideration.