Quote from: chey on March 23, 2018, 06:53:31 PM

Quote from: jdoi on March 23, 2018, 06:00:04 PM

Quote from: chey on March 23, 2018, 05:27:07 PM

Quote from: jdoi on March 23, 2018, 05:10:25 PM

Quote from: chey on March 23, 2018, 03:57:21 PM

Be ready for "Monero Classic" cause you know it's gonna happen.

I'm not well conversant with Ethereum and Ethereum Classic (apart from they got hacked due to flaw and decided to hard fork, but am unsure why the old coin was required to be still in circulation), but why would you think there would be "Monero Classic". Wouldn't all demand be for Monero - and who would be responsible for Classic version, which if I'm not wrong would not be v7 or basically current version open to Asics?

Why wouldn't there be? It's not about the tech. It's quite simple really ... in matters such as these there will always be a conflict of opposed ideas or attitudes or goals. A difference of opinion.

Let me also add...If/when Monero forks to a new algorithm, if it is indeed a profitable coin, ASICS will be made. This is inevitable. Then what...? Another fork?

Time to get realistic.

I thought Monero do the hard fork every 6 months which would further make things difficult to constantly produce new ASICs

Ref:
- https://getmonero.org/2018/02/11/PoW-change-and-key-reuse.html
- On the fork that is later this month https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/82w91m/monero_network_upgrade_at_block_153950028th_of/

Forking every six months... That's downright hilarious Cheesy

Miners and regular users will have to constantly update their wallet and/or miner software. Not only will it be a pain for the average user especially if they don't understand how forks work, it creates more work for exchanges, and forums and other support vectors will suffer because of this since they will helping all these average users through all their troubles.

The claim and the reasoning behind constant forking is to avoid "ASIC centralization." This is still a concern? Bitcoin (as an example) is almost 10 years old and people are still worried about "ASIC centralization?" Really...?

I admit ASICs may not be entirely an issue. They also face issues with large botnets that occupy much of the network hash (but that's a different discussion). I'm a bit open ended on the argument.

For the first part you mentioned i.e. the 6 month fork, it does seem like trouble, but the fast change of pow was their official proposal after the fork on Mar28 - since I not completely knowledgeable about their updates I'll refrain from commenting, though their pull request has some interesting points. Bitmain is releasing in May. If this were the final version, they could just as easily updated the ASICs by delaying this time around, wouldn't that have rendered the fork useless. The problem with the ASICs is that they were too costly to update to newer version, and if they were viable in the current form, Bitmain and others would continue to sell them at very high price. Also the bitcoin Asics remain profitable even after increase in the difficulty is due to the high price of the bitcoin. And I'm not sure if many (even if the amount is in not in hundreds of thousands or millions) people decide to mine monero, the difficulty would most certainly rise, which may not necessarily give out enough ROI to justify an single ASIC, and rather insignificant profits for smaller GPU rig miners to mine at all.
On the other hand, the adoption of ASICs for bitcoin is truly much more than anticipated though.

Ref: https://github.com/monero-project/monero/pull/3253