Quote from: Annon001 on March 23, 2018, 04:34:51 AM

Quote from: suchmoon on March 21, 2018, 09:53:45 PM

I'll take Og's word for it
-snip-
not sure why you're claiming there was no explanation

You really should stop taking someone's word for it without a proper explanation. He hasn't explained why he added nonnakip in the first place, or anyone else for that matter
They clearly do not help the community. Maybe they don't hurt it either but the fact none (or almost none) of them helps the community rises the question why they were included then

He removed nonnakip because it was too obvious his addition was wrong but it was always wrong, even the day he added him, so why did he add him?
This wouldn't matter if there were only a few cases but that appears to be the norm. So explanations are still required, or at least openness to feedback and improvement

You said there was no explanation. There was one and it's as good as any when it comes to DT1/DT2 inclusions or exclusions.

I can see why you don't like it but that's another story. Feel free to come up with evidence of wrongdoing. The mere fact of nonnakip being in DT2 does not show that.

Quote from: Annon001 on March 23, 2018, 04:34:51 AM

Quote from: suchmoon on March 21, 2018, 09:53:45 PM

Have you contacted Tomato?

I can't PM him, he doesn't receive PMs from newbies. Would you?

No. Ask QS, he's tight with Tomato.

Quote from: ibminer on March 23, 2018, 06:16:25 PM

It seems like the real question to be asked for inclusion by DT1 members is "Do I trust this persons feedback and/or judgement of other members on this forum?" If the person has not left feedback for others, there is nothing to go off of. Even if the person added has left good feedback on eBay and gives you good feedback on your product/services directly, it doesn't mean they are going to have useful or accurate feedback on this forum towards other members, and so while they may be trustworthy to you, I'm not sure they are beneficial to the DefaultTrust network which serves an important niche of the community.

I think it's possible to trust someone's judgement even if they haven't left a lot of (or any) feedback ratings yet. The OP's approach is just way too blunt.