Quote from: TrumpD on March 24, 2018, 03:37:21 PM

I've never experienced a heated thread with a lot of "high" ranking members before. This is truly "The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen"... *takes out popcorn and enjoys the show* One thing is clear out of this, there has to be a way, for transparent accountability no matter what level one is on. Just a suggestion *retreats back into seat*

There are difficult issues for trust guys to deal with .

I pruned my list and dropped from 700 to 375 score.

I had already left 70 plus people out that if I put on trust my list would jump over 1000 score.

I will later check those 70 out and see if I think they should go on the list. And each and every one I list brings my score higher.

So I have a built in conflict of interest but it would all be visible and someone like the op would see what i did.

My worry is if I only trust people that did not trust me. Then I could have a huge list. With hundreds of people

Such as the list on post reporting . I could decide to appoint everyone on that list if they are over 600 with 95% accurate. It shows no conflicts since I dont pick anyone I trade with. But I am not sure that is a good way to pick people