Quote from: The Script on July 06, 2011, 11:18:14 AM

Quote from: david4dev on July 06, 2011, 11:14:18 AM

Quote from: myrkul on July 06, 2011, 11:09:43 AM

Quote from: david4dev on July 06, 2011, 10:58:46 AM

Quote from: myrkul on July 06, 2011, 10:14:16 AM

Quote from: david4dev on July 06, 2011, 10:03:37 AM

Quote from: Reikoku on July 06, 2011, 08:36:29 AM

All left-wingers propose an incoherent worldview, because they support egalitarianism of finance only.

I class my self as a left winger but I support equality not only of finance but of rights, freedoms and decision making power.

So, how does that work, exactly? You're free to trade, as long as everything has exactly the same monetary value and nobody comes off 'better'?

I never said that and 'everything has the exact same monetary value' doesn't make sense.

"Equality of Finance" means what, then?

That the difference between earnings of the highest paid and the lowest paid is minimal.

Hmm, not to be a stickler, but what is "minimal" and who gets to decide it?

Minimal is as close to equal as is practically achievable. Equal would be ideal but would require everyone to have a strong work ethic which is unrealistic. 'Minimal' recognises that people who don't work because they are lazy don't deserve to earn as much as those who do work or those who are unable to work. The lazy people still have all of their rights but don't deserve the luxuries they could afford with a higher wage. However, people who do currently low paid jobs such as manufacture are as (realistically more) important than people in extremely high paid jobs such as banking.