Quote from: kevoh on March 26, 2018, 05:36:23 AM

80% of the time, a shit/spammy post is clearly defined from it's content and gets the "shut the fuck up button" with no protests.

But what happens in the other 20% where a post being shitty/spammy is based on a subjective opinion. If one has a personal vendetta against a particular member or one does not like another criticising his post so he gives a 'shut the fuck up" instead! How does one circumvent this situation?

You've got the best point. That "shut the fuck up" button would be also another risk of thinking of the moderators. It could also cause another repeated topics and spam of the members like the merit system. Many would have a debate about that for sure. So let just wait till the mods would agree with this suggestion, but I'm already satisfied with the work of the DT members. All shitposters and spammers can't escape with their powers and tagging red is more better than that, and the OP must be forgotten that there is a SMAS blacklist for all shitposters cannot join signatures. Because all of the spammers were just forced their selves to post just to reach their qouta in a week for the payment.