Quote from: Ace44 on March 27, 2018, 12:22:16 PM

Quote from: jamzzz123 on March 26, 2018, 04:06:54 PM

Quote from: cryptossi on March 26, 2018, 03:52:23 PM

Quote from: Nathan01 on March 26, 2018, 01:59:24 PM

Quote from: Ace44 on March 26, 2018, 01:37:38 PM

Quote from: Nathan01 on March 26, 2018, 10:57:59 AM

Quote from: phantam on March 25, 2018, 09:42:08 PM

True which is why I said which exchange doesnt matter only volume matters. In the end binance or KuCoin will follo but chances are it will first need to go through the rounds on smaller exchanges like hitbtc to gain popularity and support. That will eventually lead to it growing as the platform evolves and be more and more in demand over time. Which will hopefully in the longterm lead to a big change listing

Truth is Hitbtc is not even a small exchange just not really a properly coordinated platform with a lot of complaints from most users, but like you said it's a step in the right direction, contractnet will eventually get listed in top exchanges just give it huge volume

Yes, is actually one of the top exchange sites like i stated earlier but yea, complaints surrounds it but is best they kickoff with one than pulse in the name of seeking bigger exchanges as it may lead to some sort of negative vibe

Has the mobile dapp system been built? From the white paper it's Q1 2018 the development is going to take place if I am correct Huh

I'm not sure if that's correct, if you look at ContractNet's roadmap it says the mobile wallet will not be ready until Q3 and the DAPP browser will not be finished until Q4.

Check it out here: https://contractnet.com/roadmap/

Thanks for confirming cryptossi, the problem is with some of these new ICO's - people check out the reviews on some third party ico reviewer which often get the dates/roadmap incorrect, so thanks for confirming the roadmap and it's good to see an official website for there planned roadmap. By Q4 we should see some real progression on this one.

Reason why is best we don't stick to these ICO rating sites, a lot of them simply do copy and paste without any review, best thing to do is go through the roadmap yourself, if you find any issue, simply head on to their telegram group and contact developer, that's just it

that's exactly what I always say. many rating sites are looking for fast money without much work. I even think that most creators of these sites are too stupid to understand the projects. So they just copy a few lines from the homepage and they're done.
I do not look at any rating pages anymore, most just annoy me