Quote from: TMAN on March 29, 2018, 11:40:32 AM

Quote from: hilariousetc on March 29, 2018, 10:22:14 AM

Quote from: malikusama on March 29, 2018, 10:12:12 AM

The second solution is to remove/restrict the condition of minimum post count from signature campaigns.

A minimum post count is better than unlimited. Minimum post counts usually aren't excessive so the user isn't forced to make hundreds, but a user has to make a minimum of x amount posts otherwise people just won't do anything. A better solution would be to actually make managers do something about spam. When you have managers like sylon who accept hundreds of users and don't do any sort of quality checks then that's when they get abused. Chipmixer has a minimum requirement of 50 posts a week but we don't see any spam coming from their campaign. The onus should be on poor managers not what minimum amount of posts are required because any amount of posts will include spam if nobody is poling them.

then the sig campaign managers need to be approved to work on the forum? I know it is more work for someone, but if mods actively managed the signature campaign managers then it would stop the need for 50%+ of the post removals ETC. It seems like more work for them initially but in reality it will make the mods life easier in the long run..

If a mod is a manager, you shouldn't let him decide who gets to be a manager.