Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on March 30, 2018, 06:52:23 AM

Quote from: ghost15 on March 30, 2018, 12:45:44 AM

you don't look like someone who can enjoy a day at the beach under the sun, you are not even someone who was able to keep his job as a pharmacist in real life, you don't digest this fact, at the point you created a profile on this forum to live the life you wanted but that was deprived by those who knew your real competence, you can be king here.

other people's PM's quotes do not justify your actions, if you accepte to be a DT member, you should accept the following facts.
and about Lauda feedback it's a thousand times better than yours in these acts, I do not have to contact him several times for realize the gravity of the facts and he was not the only one to revise feedback because they were all responsible people.

you; you are not looking for potential danger but rather for the suspect edeal.

If there was any sliver of hope remaining that would you get the outcome you wanted here, you just destroyed it with that post. Resorting to argumentum ad hominem generally means you have no logical arguments left to make, and you have lost the dispute. Time to accept you were busted and move on.

ghost15 is without a doubt frustrated and I'm sure of that because why was he/she keeps on fighting to remove his/her red trust that was almost 2 years now(I think because of ranking w/ merit system is hard Grin

) instead of accepting the fact that there are people who have static perspective. If you read this whole thread you can see that I am neutral about this matter but I think that the OP got a point in his/her justification based on his/her comparison to one of the forum member that may be not equal to his/her case. Please try to back read again.

Quote

When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser

can this be considered plagiarism? because you didn't put 'Socrates' as your source Cheesy

.