Quote
Trying to resolve the b1 debts doesn't look possible now, the only option to do that would be confiscating Risto's CK assets and distributing them to b1 creditors, but without Risto involved this won't be cool with many people, and IMO it's worse than putting the b1 debts in the too hard basket. Who has authority to do this? Some people have already made a good profit from CK, if they also hold b1 debts and would get more, some people will obviously complain that isn't fair because they haven't experienced any CK losses, and didn't feel the CK 'burn'.
Are you saying that distributing Ristos assets to people he ows money to won't be cool with many people but distributing his assets to the game will?
---------------
It's so easy to get unanimous support for the "fork".
Just pay the debtors what they're owed.
And don't spin this again on muh 1000BTC
It's not a 1000BTC
When the debtor refuses to repay what he ows, you seize what he has.
This has never been the games debt but the game wants to steal Ristos funds, the assets that belong to his debtors.
The fork will be started on immoral behaviour and I gotta agree with moneromoo, a bit scammy too.
Especially considering CrazyLoaf used to be the most vocal Ristos shill throughout the existance of the game and he constantly tries to avoid his assets being distributed to people he ows money to.
-------------------
A lot of missinformation is constantly being recycled throughout this thread
People are not going to invest in the game because there's a debt?
There is no debt if you pay the debtors
However, you can choose not to pay them and seize the funds for yourself and start the game on a foundation of immorality
What's better for the game?
That people know we honor our agreements?
Or that we act upon them as we see fit?