Quote from: jsmithuk on March 30, 2018, 07:26:52 PM

Quote from: 55Domains on March 30, 2018, 05:02:44 PM

I have personally been offered a position which i kindly rejected. And never have i been mentioned anywhere on any website, which leads me to believe (rightfully so) that everyone mentioned has also agreed to be mentioned, or do i just happen to be the exception given your theory?

For someone who has been with this project since the beginning, you have a very short memory, or you are purposefully being deceitful because you are shilling what's left of the Monkey Capital scam.

Perhaps you forget this list: https://icobench.com/ico/monkey-capital/team

Stefan Hickmott was never the CFO. He had one phone call with DMH and then was put in the white paper, website, and ICO advertising sites as the CFO to build credibility. Stefan never game permission, never had any kind of agreement written or verbal, and received zero consideration. All he received was mother's quilting business getting dox'ed and briefed by crazy scammed Monkeys.
Seth Shapiro is an advisor? You mean the same Seth of which DMH was posting extortion "you screwed my investors, pay us back now or suffer the consequences" Seth?
Darshan Vyas said Loud Capital never had any agreement, was not an investor, and the entire SpaceX investmnet was all speculative gobbledygook. But that didn't stop DMH from usurping Darshan and Loud's credibility in the white paper did it?
Simon Barry was supposed to build this media empire we kept hearing. It's more like DMH home producing a Youtube video with bad audio and using some default Wordpress template for this website.
Sriram Durvasula - who?
Sam Chua - Remember in the white paper where Sam is listed as an independent auditor, when it's his own personal assistant who he screwed for $50k.

See the link above all the other advisors who never did anything except for Josh Hawley who became symbolic CEO and then bailed in a blaze of fire and brimstone, and Peerchemist, the only legitimate person on that list, who bailed as soon as he realized it was a scam and there was no substance there. He even burned his COE rather than sell it to the masses (good show, Mr. Peerchemist) and warned his investor friends who had put in $500k+ in the project to bail. Unfortunately, Peer's friends decided to stay with the cult promises and lost everything.

And you can move beyond just the people misrepresentations and go back over the long history of other misrepresentations. Remember GFL? There was never any agreement, yet that didn't start DMH from making actual offer for securities options that was never honored. This isn't even COE/MNY/MARS/PRE/WTF/COA hostage token.

Many, many, many more instances to mention but people can use the search function for that. Just wanted to call you out on the BS assertion "everyone mentioned has also agreed to be mentioned."

"Which leads me to believe".

I can only speak from personal experience. I will call the show to be over when its over, why would i do so before that?
So other people dont invest? There is nothing to invest in right now, other then futx/r, as already mentioned those are essentially backed by eth, so yes, if eth falls then those do aswell in value.... hows that the fault of the currency/concept thou. I stick to the fact that i would much rather see every ICO use the same model instead of the simple ICO method. It is undenieable that NO PROJECT needs 200M or 500M or even just 30M for developments, atleast none that has so far came into existence. Those numbers are rediculous in every sense. Would people look at the concept that has actually been created by Fbanking, and start to insist on the fact that such money is simply not needed to create any of the promises, then that would stop the real scams. You all are in here saying MC/FB is/was a scam, before the show is even over, well what about every single other ICO out there? Raising 30M, 50M 100M? and simply pocketing the money using only a very small % of that to continuously develop so called "new" things that are nothing but a copy of BTC or ETH with some fancy terms on top, with a few exceptions of course, are those not all scams? Those infact are the real scams, and people will realise this when one after the other will start to simply vanish into thin air, and at this point people will wish they had bought a token they could exchange back for 85% the Eth or the BTC they invested.
As far as i am aware MC canceled the ICO just before it started, while they could have very well held the ICO and also taken in Millions upon Millions from the crypto community.