Quote from: Lantic_Mining on April 03, 2018, 10:39:45 PM

Quote from: Turbogame on April 03, 2018, 06:47:20 PM

Thank you for the point of view! We understand you. You're right, at the start we don't have significant distinctions. The only important thing we have is a voting system which not many projects use.
To develop project and make it more notable we need a strong marketing campaign and we're working on it. Promotion activities take funds, so we need to sell some quantity of nodes. There is no many coins at this moment because the network works for just 20 days.
Thank you for your opinion! We have to consider it. We'll make updates and see how it affects to platform and community. If it brings a huge negative effect, we'll arrange a voting and discussion with community members, then we'll use our flexibility and change the algorithm. What do you think?

I guess we just wouldn't agree that the community effect of the change is worth it just to increase the attractiveness and price of the MN's. The long term effect on the coin we think will be negative although short term I guess you will sell plenty of MN's when the ROI is published on masternode sites.

Like I said we don't have a stake in this and may be wrong but it's enough for us at least to avoid any involvement. If it's simply your way of solving your mining centralisation problem then the algo switch you mentioned would make more sense.

Thank you for your opinion, it's really important and worthy to us