Quote from: redlay on April 04, 2018, 09:45:08 AM

Quote from: zhaojundong on April 04, 2018, 09:41:44 AM

Quote from: redlay on April 04, 2018, 09:39:10 AM

Quote from: zhaojundong on April 04, 2018, 09:36:11 AM

Quote from: redlay on April 04, 2018, 09:34:13 AM

Quote from: zhaojundong on April 04, 2018, 09:31:05 AM

Quote from: redlay on April 04, 2018, 09:25:48 AM

Quote from: zhaojundong on April 04, 2018, 09:21:14 AM

Quote from: redlay on April 04, 2018, 09:18:59 AM

If this project is for github, can we say that it will be an open source project?

Of course. This is even written in whitepaper.

Hmm...

And what is it for? Well, that is an open source project. And the project is of such high complexity. Why did they choose this option?

Because the team wants to attract as many users as possible to audit its platform, as well as implement various improvements and changes.

But is this not going to affect the overall stability of the system? I mean changes. which will be made by users who do not have sufficient knowledge in this area. Will not this damage the overall stability of the system?

Actually it does not work that way. You understand, after every change you make it is separated into a separate branch for development. These are the features of the work of such repositories as github. So on the stability of the system this will not have any effect.

In this case, I fully support such a decision. Some users really can greatly improve this product I believe.

I hope that this will also be encouraged by the system in the form of additional tokens, as far as I know, so it will be.

By the way, I did not think about it at once. Yes, such work should be encouraged, otherwise what's the point of doing this. For the sake of enthusiasm? Somehow it looks dubious. So the promotion in the form of tokens looks very nice!

Yes, I totally agree, it remains only to find out exactly what amounts of promotion can be discussed Cheesy