Re: hilariousandco, Mitchell,Vod,Ognasty Bitblisscoin.com could be a scamsite
ALU is a private organization run by you and it's members are hand selected by you to represent your for profit services.
No.Must be nice to think you can advertise services for scammers, and then have no liability whatsoever.
Managers don't advertise, and this is not related to me.Wrong, he did act on it. He continued with his charade knowing full well it was a lie. I don't care what he didn't do, I care what he did do. In this case, he did go along with a lie in order to scam users out of their funds with the excuse that the scam was a marketing strategy.
No, it is not his charade. In order for it to be his charade, he'd either have to: a) Make the statement himself. b) Back it up. c) Be part of the team who made it. None of these apply. What he did wrong was not stopping both threads as soon as that statement was made. Any exaggeration beyond this is just malicious on anyone's end. Then why make the information public? I would think ALU exists to give it's members a united front that the organization is backed by more than one person, giving it the illusion of having more accountability if one of them goes rogue, yet you have now openly stated that ALU is in no way responsible for the actions of it's members, which in my opinion makes it worthless and you should be open about this.
There you have your answer. You would think. ALU can never be responsible for the actions of individuals.You seem to state that nobody needs to know who it's members are and if some of them are scammers it's nobody's business. I disagree, a lot.
Former, correct. Latter, incorrect. Quite the number of *managers* don't disclose any members (some notable names have people working with them, but these people are usually just in the background), yet you don't seem to take interest in who is working with who unless it revolves around me. 
Quoting for ridiculousness. You've heard it from Lauda. ALU is nothing. Has no accountability. Has no funds. Shares nothing between it's members. It's members can post announcements for scams and that is not considered their action or responsibility nor does it reflect upon the other members. Basically, if ALU is pushing an ICO it means that it could be a scam and Lauda is perfectly fine with that so long as it doesn't effect him negatively in any way. This evidenced from the fact that a fellow ALU member has now openly admitted to taking part in a scam to steal investor funds through fraud and still maintains a positive trust rating from Lauda.
Why would I want to disclose our inner workings to you exactly? You need an actually profitable endeavor to copy?
Ya, you know me. Broke as a joke barely getting by in my shanty. Clearly my motivations must be financial and not trying to make this place better by getting rid of the trash that is flooding this forum with ICOs and turning away newbies from Bitcoin by giving them an awful first experience investing in scams.