Quote from: Lauda on April 05, 2018, 11:20:34 PM

Quote from: gobsmacker on April 05, 2018, 11:15:24 PM

Quote from: Lauda on April 05, 2018, 09:34:26 PM

Yes, the former is true. Just don't go back to your old habits, I don't need people visiting the hospital.

I'm trying to follow along with my popcorn in hand. What did you mean by this, Lauda?

It has a secret meaning; have fun with your imagination though. No, it is not a threat of any kind as insinuated before by mr. Nasty, and to which I have responded here:

Quote from: Lauda on April 05, 2018, 09:58:45 PM

Quote from: OgNasty on April 05, 2018, 09:56:39 PM

Is this some sort of threat? Pathetic.

Nope. Next time use words.

I see the angle that you tried to make there ("Lauda the witch threatening to put OgNasty in a hospital"). Sorry, won't work. I don't resort to physical violence, unlike *some*. Roll Eyes

Maybe, maybe not.

I would say that you guys calling zeroaxl's family (particularly if a listed number) carried an implicit threat of physical violence. Especially after you used a supposedly neutral third party to goad him into doxxing himself with his passport. "Pay us, otherwise we know who you are, who your family is, and where you live." That's violent mobster level shit. That's the most disgusting part of that story.

Quote from: Lauda on April 05, 2018, 11:25:05 PM

Quote from: OgNasty on April 05, 2018, 11:21:49 PM

...Lauda's crew for fear of retaliation..

There is no such thing and there was never any retaliation on anyone.

I saw you retaliate against someone for criticizing you very recently.

On 2018-02-04, user VirosaGITS (previously 40: -0 / +4) opened a thread titled "The forum would probably be a slightly better place without Lauda's nonsense."

On 2018-02-06, Lauda left negative feedback for VirosaGITS [??: -1 / +4]. Lauda claims that VirosaGITS was pulling a "self-escrow" scam. But if you look at the context and chat logs, he said that he was willing to use an IRL escrow (as opposed to paying high forum escrow fees) if payment up front on the basis of his positive trust and trading history was unacceptable. Neither of these things is untrustworthy. Neither of them are a "self-escrow" scam. If you read the chat logs, there is literally nothing indicative of a scam or intent to scam. There was literally no agreement made and no shadiness to speak of on VirosaGITS's part. The rest of Lauda's feedback is meaningless unverifiable blathering about "false claims" and "slander."

As it turns out, the user VirosaGITS supposedly "scammed" was trying to pull an escrow scam himself.

Yet, Lauda's negative trust rating of VirosaGITS still remains. It seems like a very clear cut case of trust abuse triggered by VirosaGITS's thread about Lauda.

Unsurprisingly, no one else tagged VirosaGITS because the notion of doing so was ridiculous. Yet no one on Default Trust was willing to speak against Lauda for this retaliation, either. No one wants to bring that kind of wrath on themselves for obvious reasons.

I commend OG for having the balls to stand up to Lauda.