Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: hilariousandco, Mitchell,Vod,Ognasty Bitblisscoin.com could be a scamsite
by
pugman
on 06/04/2018, 12:51:41 UTC
So what do we have here?
  • aTriz starts up an organization named ALU alongside Lauda and Untold. Now Loyce V, and a couple more mangers are added as co-managers.
  • aTriz is contacted by bitblisscoin "team" (or vice-versa?) and he agrees to create their ANN thread and run their campaigns and then he stops the signature campaign after a week or so due to issues with the ICO.
  • 2 weeks later of running their bounty campaign of bitblisscoin, aTriz is informed that bitblisscoin "team" has raised nothing and he is forced to lie that bitblisscoin has raised so and so in the name of a marketing strategy. Wow. Not cool dude. Undecided
  • aTriz never decides to tell his co-partners let alone the whole community. All for a few bucks?

Here are a few questions that I am intrested in knowing :
Is this the only time that aTriz has lied about something? Has this happened before also and users weren't aware about it?

What is the purpose of ALU if the partners don't know what the other partners are up to?

Lauda, do you ever consult or work with aTriz for the campaigns and ANN threads he sets up? Do you give them a recheck or something?

ALU's thread says they are trusted but this is actually a huge question in mind, why should anyone trust any campaign or ICO ya'll manage because you have already lied about the information in the past.

What exactly is ALU if it's not an organization and has no capital? Just a random group of people who just manage campaigns and design web pages and signatures?


I personally didn't expect this to ever be true because I did participated in multiple campaigns ran by aTriz because I blindfoldedly trusted him (I know I am stupid but not anymore). I don't mean to be offensive but things are getting out of hand.
Similar questions have been asked but the thread has already been derailed too much to get any info from it.
Edit :- aTriz, you don't have to refund any user if you don't manage the scammy icos in the first place. This is the second time this is happening. Also why would any user invest in such icos just like that? It's just basic stupidity. Trust no one, one of the best policies IMO. (i know I'm an hypocrite)