Quote from: pugman on April 06, 2018, 12:51:41 PM

What is the purpose of ALU if the partners don't know what the other partners are up to?

As a 'one-in-all' kind of service it works (or worked); the latter part should be intuitive given the setup. There are no ALU funds, and there are no split commissions. If you are working on something, you get paid for your part. Put some thought into it, is it easier for 4 individual managers to advertise their services or for the 4 managers to advertise under 1 name?

Quote from: pugman on April 06, 2018, 12:51:41 PM

Lauda, do you ever consult or work with aTriz for the campaigns and ANN threads he sets up? Do you give them a recheck or something?

I don't think I've ever really commented on any ANN that isn't related to me (i.e. those that are solely managed by him and/or others). The answer to the 2nd question is no. As I've previously said, I'm not here to babysit others.

Quote from: pugman on April 06, 2018, 12:51:41 PM

ALU's thread says they are trusted but this is actually a huge question in mind, why should anyone trust any campaign or ICO ya'll manage because you have already lied about the information in the past.

The members are (or were..) 'trusted'. However, this doesn't imply (and never has) that the project being managed is trusted. Do your due diligence when participating and investing.

Quote from: pugman on April 06, 2018, 12:51:41 PM

What exactly is ALU if it's not an organization and has no capital? Just a random group of people who just manage campaigns and design web pages and signatures?

We never put a (existing) label on it; I'm wondering what the appropriate definition should be myself (less important right now given the situation). It does not have capital as a singular entity, and it never did.

Quote from: Lauda on April 06, 2018, 11:50:50 AM

Quote from: ibminer on April 06, 2018, 11:46:34 AM

I dislike appeasing those that want negative feedback for the wrong reasons, but I've done what I felt was right, and tried to be as objective as I could in the process.

I appreciate your objectivity. You could have answered to my response, but the thread got quickly derailed as soon as people joined for the wrong reasons. Nevertheless, I might have some private questions (not that case specific anyways).

Update to this: aTriz has been suspended until further notice by a 2-0 vote. More time is needed, and less distraction before a proper decision can be made.
@ibminer: To the previous stuff, we've started working on a disclaimer. I hope that more manager follow us in that regard (once it is live).