Quote from: Andrew_Tassel on April 07, 2018, 08:52:27 AM

Quote from: GoaCoinCore on March 30, 2018, 12:21:32 PM

Hey. We did not plan to add coins to owners masternodes. We thought that everyone would choose 2000 or 3000 GOA. But the community decided differently.
We will sumup voting results on 8th of April. Until then, you are ready to listen to your proposals and if the community supports changes, they will be accepted.

Devs, I appeal to you. You are or the stupidest fools I know or arrogant swindlers who decided to "play democracy" with the community.
You organized a voting, what to do with the coin.
Voting, Carl! Which anyone can participate. Not only MN owners or GOA holders. Me, my brother, my bestfriend, my girlfriend, my grandma and 89 colleagues at work.
Voting in the Internet, Carl! Where everyone can have as many Google accounts, as they want. Me, my brother and my best friend each have three accounts.
Where for $10 you can buy 100 votes in any social network. I overseeing for the vote and first 150 votes came in a week, 120 votes came for yesterday, but this morning about 70 votes came per hour. And they made exactly 50% for PoS+MN. Brilliant!
This voting is totally crapped.
Not community decided implement MN+PoS, not community decided rise MN cost up to 10 000 GOA, not community decided change reward for block to 10 GOA. Some guy with at lest 70 bots (I think 150 is closer to the truth) decided.
What a coincidence, all this decisions are very beneficial for devs!
500 000 premined GOA + PoS. Wow! Such many coins! Such profitable! Such richy!
MN owners each needs of additional 9000 goa to receiving half of the former reward. Deficiency of coins. GOA price pumping up. Devs sells PoS-mined coins. MN owners sucks cocks.
Fortunately, I have a grandma and 89 colleagues, so at this moment we have only MN+PoS implementation. But guy with hundreds bots can return.
So, what can you say about all this?
Do you accept voting results?

I noticed something very similar a few days ago but instead of what you mentioned EVERY vote was for MN 1000 and MN and POW so it's not all one way.

I do find it a very strange way to vote tho like you mention especially with the number of coins required for a masternode.

IMO the vote should of been 1) do we increase the number of coins required for a MN? and not how many should it be (that should of been decided after) as giving it different amounts diluted the figure down of the amount of people who would vote for an increase in coins as they had 4 options to choose from where as the same just required 1.

Example

1000 votes are cast

206 vote 1000 coins required
200 vote 10000 coins required
199 vote 2000 coins required
198 vote 3000 coins required
197 vote 5000 coins required

So if the above happened then 1000 would win even tho almost 80% would of wanted the number of coins required to be increased for a MN which should really of won IMO.