Quote from: Andrew_Tassel on April 07, 2018, 10:04:53 PM

Quote from: Mike_IG on April 07, 2018, 09:00:50 PM

IMO and it's just MO if you are asking colleagues to vote for what you want as well that's really no different to cheating with bots

But the vote results will not show comnunity opinion. Two men decide future of coin. Of course if one of them not dev. In this case devs decided everything already.

Quote from: Mike_IG on April 07, 2018, 09:00:50 PM

Think of it like this if people need 2000 coins to get a masternode and because of people having to buy more doubles the price of the coin then it's no different than 1000 at half the price as the coins you are getting are now worth twice as much.

The coins I will getting will worth twice only if I will have working MN. But first I will have to buy 1000 coins by doubled price.
In case MN will cost 10 000 GOA I will have to buy 9000 coins by x10 price.
And PoS+MN mean I can't mine requred coins with my rig.
Excellent prospects!
I bought 1000 GOA by $9 and I don't want buy another 9000 GOA neither by ¢5 nor even more by ¢50.
If devs want to raise the price of a coin they should solve this problem and MN owner do not have to pay for it.
I think best way is raise MN cost on 500 GOA per month. All new coins will be used to support work MNs. The deficit of coins will cause increase of price. Constant deficite for a months.
But i believe devs just will set new MN price and everyone who don't have 10 000 GOA will suffer.

I agree with what you say regarding community opinion but what you have done wont show community opinion either.

You wont have to buy 1000 coins at double the price is you buy first.

I get PoS+MN means you cant mine required coins but then GOA isn't even close to being the best coin to mine profit wise, If you want more coins then really you should mine a more profitable coin and then sell that coin and buy Goa from that which will in turn rise the price of Goa, Win Win.