Quote from: pzrqvw on April 09, 2018, 03:30:08 PM

Quote from: Gutenhans on April 09, 2018, 12:29:37 PM

Quote from: someonesomeone on April 09, 2018, 08:40:03 AM

Yes, the fees will go towards buybacks, but I doubt that it will listed on the ICN platform because it is only for professional investors...

Quote from: Gutenhans on April 09, 2018, 07:18:48 AM

Quote from: someonesomeone on April 07, 2018, 12:00:57 PM

I doubt it because they stated that only professional investors will be able to purchase these funds...

Quote from: sud on April 05, 2018, 05:50:26 AM

So will Nina Columbus be available to buy on Iconomi platform just like regular funds? I've only glimpsed thru the medium article but haven't found this info, only about traditional stock exchange.

where have you seen this statement? To my knowledge they said they will pay fees to iconomi that means using the iconomi platform.

check the last sentence in the post

https://medium.com/@columbuscapital/2018-the-year-of-columbus-capital-q-a-2e53e01bfed9

Iconomi said the whole time they are a investing platform for everybody, professional investors included.
At the moment actually they focus only on professional investors regarding marketing (see meet the managers events). Can't see a reason why some professional investor would say pass at iconomi platform.
Actually i can find a few reasons someone that wants to invest in crypto BIG time can make himself a private/public DAA with the platform being super easy to use.
They have top security. They are insured and use cold storage. This is what professional investors are searching for.
Big four audit it's also in the roadmap and goal is to gain trust from big money.
Fiat gateway it's also a tool for big players. And at first will be open only for big deposits.
Almost everything they develop it's meant to bring big investors.

got some questions

why would you think professional investors would avoid Iconomi platform? what would they have as a alternative with decent fees and fort Knox security?
why should columbus pay fees to iconomi if they don't host the funds?
DAA's produce fees to iconomi when you let your money on the iconomi platform (managing fees) and when you sell from a daa fund from the platform (exit fees).
they don't perceive fees from financial operations outside the platform and i did not hear any rumor about they planing to do so. Do you have info otherwise?

i don't use rocketchat if what info you have is from there please share.

an interesting project rather for retail investors could be:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3270527.0

Team does not have experience in other projects not to mention finance. Philipp Doğan it's the only one with a 2 year work experience. At least is this is what come up with doing a quick search. They speak about Switzerland and Swiss law in the concept paper yet none of them are from there. Building a business in a country that is foreign to you and you don't have any past experience in doing so it's not a wise choice. Token distribution it's the point that draws the line 35% from all token will be sold to the public. These are bad numbers and if you consider that they want to make a system that pays dividends it's even worse. this means you will get only 35% of the profit that will be distributed to 100% investors. If they we're really planning to make a divident system that works and will pay good somewhere in the future they would have gone maybe with less than 15% of the tokens for team costs and everything else. Iconomi had 85% of the tokens sold in crowdsale. Not to ruin your party but i would be a little careful how much i invest with them.