Just because a person makes a bad decision, does not make them intrinsically bad, or even a scammer for that matter. [1]
-sni-
Wouldn't it have been more logical to tell aTriz how to make this right, rather than going this route?[9]
[1] This applies to hundreds of others who have been negged for one single issue and will never be given a second chance.
P.S. Did @snakey get his investment back?
P.P.S. Are there other claimants as well?
It's understandable what you mean here but looking at past I don't think there were enough members:-
1. Who were frankly telling about the company and revealing the marketing strategy to the community even when it could put them in danger.
2. Who were paying back their loans when they were negged.
3. Who tried to resolve the accusation against them rather than making a nuisance out of it.
To deserve the 2nd chance.
I can give several examples but I think you are smart enough to figure out those from the way you talk. Everyone does mistakes and after having several deals with atriz on and off forum regarding loans and a few other things I don't think he had any bad intention in his mind he just didn't paid any attention.
As we know atriz admitted that they hardly collected more than 1
BTC so if
Atriz can pay for the loss Caused by Bitbliss to the guy in the video and promise to be careful in future regarding managing bounties/sign campaigns for the companies like this one then he must be given a second chance.
Would like to see how many agree with me.
Sorry if this will sound rude
STOP CONFUSING BITBLISSCOIN AND CHRYSOSCOIN-snip-
Hmm, I see your point there. But when it comes to marketing, most ICOs employ tactics that could be considered shady, e.g. Artificially increasing hype in their ANN thread[1], incentivising positive reviews[2], buying telegram members and activity[3], all of this under the guise of guerilla marketing. It must be difficult to draw the line in what is acceptable[4], and what isn't when the entire ecosystem is built upon shady marketing ethics. I am not saying aTriz was right, obviously he's a complete moron for not ditching Bitblisscoin when the evidence [5] started mounting, I'm just pointing out that it's an easy mistake[6] to make, and one I'm sure he would rectify if given the chance[7].
[1] Against forum rules, @mprep usually thrashes those threads and has even temp banned the OP.
[2] Again a Scammy attribute, call them out.
[3] Call them out.
[4] It's quite easy unless someone you like or love gets caught in between. For me, a single lie does it, unless the circumstances change.
[5] In his own words, he was somehow forced to lie, I wonder how?
[6] That's just your opinion and not a fact.
[7] As I have already asked you, HOW ?
-snip-
[9] This is a totally rational route to take, people who will deal with this account in the future should know what he has done in the past and as members have rightly pointed out that Atriz has stopped responding to these and has not even tendered an apology (not that it should change his neg), he simply wants to ignore it and move ahead, also what would you suggest to make it right?
--
P.S. A number of people have been commenting without reading all the facts of the matter and have their own predisposed notions. Get rid of them and grasp the facts.