Quoting provides context to those who do not read the entire thread, so I will continue to do it. I will, however, trim the material quoted to the minimum necessary in order to assuage your delicate sensibilities.

As for your continuing and pointless argument about whether or not the government's attack upon e-gold constituted a "fiasco" or not, we'll just have to agree to disagree and let it go. Further debate on the subject will serve no purpose other than to let people know that you are a troll.

Quote from: ShadowOfHarbringer on December 31, 2010, 03:47:05 PM

Quote from: Jason on December 30, 2010, 10:53:21 PM

I followed the e-gold saga for some time (some people I know are/were in the digital metal currency market).

I would call it a fiasco for a number of reasons:

[...]

From what you are saying, it clearly looks like it was not fiasco. Government was simply more powerful and destroyed it.
It is not a fiasco of currency itself. If you have army big enough, You can destroy just any non-bulion centralized currency by simply invading the country which issues the currency.

** Also, please stop quoting below messages. It is annoying as hell. ** This is not usenet or email.