Quote from: blacklig on April 14, 2018, 05:19:43 AM

Quote from: sjyi on April 14, 2018, 04:16:44 AM

Quote from: PrometherioN on April 13, 2018, 07:09:43 PM

Quote from: ztaz on April 13, 2018, 07:05:35 PM

after reading the last ten pages of this branch - suggests that this project is gaining momentum and rolling into a deep pit ... constant charges of fraud, debris, scams ... the price of the coin does not stay in place and continues to fall, the community is slowly disintegrating - this very bad Angry

Yea it looks like this but in fact its a great project with devs hard working and personally i think with great future and good white paper however devs do their job and don't care about bitcoin talk thread so it looks as it looks - I wouldn't worry about that anyway

The long awaited roadmap seems to be missing information, especially the Asset management protocol.

I've uploaded updates to the "RPC commands for assets" into github.
I've also included interaction diagrams for some of the use cases.

So far, I have not heard any responses.

I think they (devs?) should have been able to release a doc that is more detailed.

Interesting.
How come it misses?
Didnt devs release Aprils whitepaper, if it appeared on official website that day?

I sincerely hope Raven succeeds as a coin. More importantly as a multi-asset management platform.

The genesis block was released on Jan. 3rd, 2018. I think there were a few months of lead prior to that date.

I started to mine the coin in early Feb. So I anxiously waited for the roadmap. At that time the only thing that was released was the description of X16r with the notice that the roadmap would be coming.

The roadmap provides more information than many of the rushed altcoins being introduced these days, the section on RPC commands for assets seems to be quite terse. The current information seems to be based on actual code implementation. While this is good, the roadmap should be able to specify what WILL be implemented, not what was already implemented.

The roadmap lists functions/features broken down to phases.

The Appendix lists commands from Phase 2 - Assets as well as Phase 4 - Unique Assets (makeuniqueasset(), listuniqueassets().

The Phase 2 - Assets related RPC commands seem to be incomplete. Commands issue() and issuefrom() seems to be redundant without significant benefit for maintaining both methods.

Utilizing the current set of commands need additional features/functions to accomplish the terse requirement listed in the roadmap.

If anyone is interested, we can exchange more detailed analysis.