Quote from: CYPER on November 03, 2013, 10:32:59 PM

Quote from: ASIC-K on November 03, 2013, 10:26:16 PM

Quote from: CYPER on November 03, 2013, 10:22:09 PM

Let's see what firmware they come up with Monday, because so far I'm far from impressed or satisfied with the product, not to mention the delay for which I still expect compensation.
Don't want to be nagging daily, but it seems that's the only way with KNC.

Jupiter 1 is hashing with 0.98.1(beta) at stable 564GH/s with 0.9% HW erros - no complaints there. The only thing that can be improved is the power consumption, but no big deal for now.

Jupiter 2 is still averaging 420GH/s with 0.98. The beta firmware did not help and it even reduced the hash speed to around 390-400GH/s. I expect improvements there.

i wouldnt expect any kind of compensation for delays....kind of expected with this type of hardware. we are the guinea pigs! and im ok with that.

I think there is a direct correlation between the number of days that one's order is delayed past the 15th October and the expectation for a compensation.
The longer the delay, the higher the expectation.
I am not surprised that people who endured a delay of less than 5 days are less inclined to argue over any compensation.
But I waited 14 days and while some people are half way to their ROI, I am nowhere near that, which makes me far from happy and satisfied as a KNCminer customer.

+1

I didn't sign up to be a guinea pig to test faulty hardware or the price should have reflected that.

As far as I can see, I paid a massively marked-up price to be supplied a professionally designed and built product on or before mid October 2013. I'm also less than impressed with the faulty goods I actually recieved well after that date.