Quote from: Nathan01 on April 17, 2018, 06:48:18 PM

Quote from: phantam on April 17, 2018, 02:52:14 PM

Quote from: Cnote328 on April 17, 2018, 02:43:47 PM

Quote from: faulerwilli on April 17, 2018, 08:53:32 AM

Quote from: Cnote328 on April 17, 2018, 08:26:15 AM

Quote from: Hendobox on April 17, 2018, 07:43:58 AM

Quote from: Cnote328 on April 16, 2018, 01:09:59 PM

One of the features of Bitfence is that; if a hacker attacks someone who is part of Bitfence network he will be tagged as a hacker at once and he will not be able to attack anyone else within bitfence network.

WOW! I didn't know about this attribute. I think it will really be nice for those hackers to carry the tag as a badge of honour Grin

That way we can be able to identify them

LOL, with this feature hackers will think twice before attacking anyone in BitFence network community. So if one wants to be safe from hackers BitFence is a safe heaven for all.

I think it would be great if a hacker then see a window in which reads "This system is protected by Bitfence" and a picture of a dog snarling teeth

it is really a great plan to block once identified hacker for everyone in the bitfence network.

Haha, your imagination tho, i'll love to see how Bitfence will tag the supposed hackers maybe a red danger sign.

Stuff like that while cute, is not realistic the fact is most types of attachs are not some guy trying to access a webpage on your compuer that they can reply with a nice html response error, it's mostly cryptic low level attacks with no real visible way to slap them. Beyond that advertising what blocked an attacker is a bad idea as it lets the hacker know what kind of protection the network has and narrows their focus onto breaking into bitfence's protection instead of "oh hey their blocked somehow" saying its bitfence is bad that blocked them, just like saying a mailserver is running a certain specific version of mail software is just helping the attacker with future attempts

I don't think bitfence is coming all out with what they intend to use in tracking and blocking hackers per say, i sincerely do not think that is the case, i think its more of an announcement attempt like "Hey hackers we can come at you as far as you come at us, we've developed a system" and the technical aspect of how they intend to achieve this i don't think has been or will be laid bare to the public cos that's not smart if they do

You're really right, i don't think that is a good idea to do so because that's like giving the hackers an open window to do their bidding, what i believe they are doing is just giving us the periphery of the project, the technical aspect is really meant to be hidden